Failing with passwords
Did a talk about implementing password security right last night at Five Minutes of Fame.
(Source: tersesystems.com)
Vía @schneierblog Crypto shocker: four of every 1,000 public keys provide no security (updated)
Más en http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/02/lousy_random_nu.html
“The cause of this is almost certainly a lousy random number generator used to create those public keys in the first place. This shouldn’t come as a surprise. One of the hardest parts of cryptography is random number generation. It’s really easy to write a lousy random number generator, and it’s not at all obvious that it is lousy. Randomness is a non-functional requirement, and unless you specifically test for it — and know how to test for it — you’re going to think your cryptosystem is working just fine. (One of the reporters who called me about this story said that the researchers told him about a real-world random number generator that produced just seven different random numbers.) So it’s likely these weak keys are accidental.”
Contraseñas basadas en imágenes: Microsoft’s “Picture Password”: A Breath Of Fresh Air On The Lock Screen, Of All Places | TechCrunch
Apple patenta un sistema de recuperación de contraseñas mediante el cargador de corriente. Vía @jagelado:
Apple patenta un sistema de recuperación de contraseñas mediante el cargador de corriente.
(vía Apple patent application details password-protecting power adapters | iPhone Atlas - CNET Reviews)
—
PuTTY vulnerability password-not-wiped
(Cuidado con las variables sensibles en los programas)
Google Remembers Your Old Passwords
No creo que recuerde las claves, sino más bien los ‘hashes’ o resúmenes de las claves, que no es lo mismo. En todo caso, es bueno saberlo….


